IShares Copper Competition
| COPM Etf | 8.92 -0.17 -1.87% |
Pair Correlation for IShares Copper and IShares Dow Details
Poor diversification
COPM currently posts a 0.74 correlation with IGSG, indicating a Poor diversification relationship for the active sample. This matters because lower overlap can improve diversification, while higher overlap leaves more of the same risk inside the portfolio.
Moving together with IShares Etf
Mean reversion in IShares Copper is more reliable over longer time horizons. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing and risk management critical.
IShares Copper Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for iShares Copper Miners matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. Used correctly, correlation analysis helps separate broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
IShares Copper Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between IShares Etf performing well and IShares Copper ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. A thorough review of IShares Copper's risk-adjusted indicators provides a clearer picture of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXCD | 1.06 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 1.46 | 1.99 | 8.33 | |||
| IEGZ | 0.27 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 1.64 | |||
| EMIM | 0.82 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 1.06 | 1.61 | 6.29 | |||
| IFRB | 0.20 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 1.11 | |||
| ISFA | 0.63 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.92 | 1.25 | 4.46 | |||
| STEC | 1.28 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.26 | 0.00 | 2.83 | 8.31 | |||
| SUOU | 0.20 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.55 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 1.61 | |||
| MPAB | 0.72 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 1.29 | 5.21 | |||
| IGSG | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.10 | 0.00 | 1.07 | 3.34 |
IShares Copper Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
IShares Copper Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze IShares Copper Against Peers
IShares Copper's peer analysis compares IShares Copper with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether IShares Copper trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where IShares Copper leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Competitor benchmarking for IShares Copper often reveals which operating metrics are genuinely differentiated and which appear similar across the peer group. Short interest comparison for IShares Copper and its peers can highlight which companies attract the most skepticism from market participants. The peer set can help frame whether recent outperformance is broad-based or company-specific.
The analytics block for iShares Copper Miners relies on fund disclosures and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied before rendering. Timing can vary by data vendor.