CodeLab Capital Competitors

CODE Stock   2.50  -0.30  -10.71%   
Nordhealth, SD Standard, Odfjell Drilling, Nordic Mining, and Arcticzymes Technologies and similar firms make up the peer group for CodeLab Capital AS. This provides context for comparative analysis. All metrics are calculated from reported financial data without adjustment. All values are presented as reference data. CodeLab Capital AS is positioned against peers on valuation, growth, and risk to highlight relative strength. Comparative context helps frame CodeLab Capital's standing across key financial dimensions.

CodeLab Capital vs Arcticzymes Technologies Correlation Summary

Good diversification
Across the chosen horizon, CODE and AZT show a correlation of -0.12 and fall into the Good diversification bucket. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.

Moving against CodeLab Stock

  0.39AUTO AutoStore HoldingsPairCorr
  0.36MOWI Mowi ASAPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The mean reversion effect in CodeLab Capital is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamental change. Identifying the root cause of CodeLab Capital's price dislocation is essential before acting.
Competitive positioning is a critical dimension of CodeLab Capital analysis. Understanding where CodeLab Capital AS stands relative to its peers on returns, growth, and valuation supports assessment of whether its advantage is sustainable.

CodeLab Capital Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between CodeLab Capital AS and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. Peer comparison still matters because industry and category context remain part of the investment case. In practical terms, lower correlation may offer better diversification while higher correlation may leave the portfolio more exposed to one shared driver.

High positive correlations

NOMNORDH
ODLSDSD
TRSBNORDH
NOMTRSB
AZTSDSD
AZTODL
  

High negative correlations

NOMODL
ODLNORDH
NOMSDSD
SDSDNORDH
ODLTRSB
AZTTRSB

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

CodeLab Capital Company may look attractive on headline returns alone, but deeper analysis often tells a different story. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze CodeLab Capital's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

CodeLab Capital Competitive Analysis

    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
CODE NORDH TRSB SDSD ODL NOM AZT
 10.71 
2.50
CodeLab
 5.76 
26.20
Nordhealth
 0.77 
113.12
Trndelag
 0.53 
1.86
SDSD
 4.16 
96.80
Odfjell
 5.26 
11.60
Nordic
 1.26 
19.65
Arcticzymes
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Current Asset
Retained Earnings
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Z Score
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Target Price
Debt To Equity
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

CodeLab Capital Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze CodeLab Capital Against Peers

CodeLab Capital's peer analysis compares CodeLab Capital with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether CodeLab Capital trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where CodeLab Capital leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

The competition view for CodeLab Capital includes correlation data, showing which peers are financially similar and which ones move together in the market. Valuation premiums or discounts for CodeLab Capital become more meaningful when measured against the peer group rather than in isolation. Comparative analysis works best when peers share business drivers, cycle exposure, and capital structure characteristics.

Unless otherwise specified, data for CodeLab Capital AS is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Updates may occur throughout the day.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Michael Smolkin - Member of Macroaxis Board of Directors
Last reviewed on March 11th, 2026