CILEASING Competitors
| CILEASING | 7.30 -0.15 -2.01% |
C I and NEM INSURANCE Correlation Overview
Poor diversification
The correlation between CILEASING and NEM is 0.75, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion opportunities in C I's arise when market prices disconnect from fundamental anchors such as earnings, book value, or historical price-to-earnings multiples.
Relative analysis of C I against direct competitors reveals whether C I's current valuation reflects a genuine competitive advantage or simply market-wide multiple expansion that applies to all sector peers. C I Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between C I LEASING and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
| 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.0 | 0.61 | 0.65 | WAPIC | ||
| 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.0 | 0.43 | 0.8 | AIICO | ||
| 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.0 | 0.22 | 0.85 | MULTIVERSE | ||
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | AFRINSURE | ||
| 0.61 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 0.0 | 0.42 | IKEJAHOTEL | ||
| 0.65 | 0.8 | 0.85 | 0.0 | 0.42 | NEM | ||
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between CILEASING Stock performing well and C I Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze C I's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAPIC | 3.01 | 0.55 | 0.14 | 0.75 | 2.90 | 7.69 | 17.37 | |||
| AIICO | 2.22 | 0.27 | 0.11 | -0.46 | 2.11 | 4.73 | 15.35 | |||
| MULTIVERSE | 2.94 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 9.92 | 19.95 | |||
| AFRINSURE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| IKEJAHOTEL | 3.26 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 1.99 | 3.74 | 8.80 | 19.90 | |||
| NEM | 2.76 | 0.47 | 0.10 | 1.95 | 2.83 | 8.77 | 18.19 |
C I Competitive Analysis
The better you understand C I competitive position, the more informed your investment decisions will be. Measuring C I's performance against peers across a range of fundamental indicators helps expose hidden risks and opportunities.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
| CILEASING | WAPIC | AIICO | MULTIVERSE | AFRINSURE | IKEJAHOTEL | NEM | |
| 2.01 7.30 CILEASING | 0.31 3.26 CORONATION | 1.43 4.14 AIICO | 9.78 18.45 MULTIVERSE | 0.00 0.20 AFRICAN | 4.64 36.00 IKEJA | 3.99 31.30 NEM | Market Volatility (90 Days Market Risk) |
| Market Performance (90 Days Performance) | |||||||
| Odds of Financial Distress (Probability Of Bankruptcy) | |||||||
| Current Valuation (Equity Enterprise Value) | |||||||
| Buy or Sell Analysis (Average Analysts Consensus) | |||||||
Trade Advice (90 Days Macroaxis Advice) | |||||||
| Day Typical Price | |||||||
| Accumulation Distribution | |||||||
| Market Facilitation Index | |||||||
| Daily Balance Of Power | |||||||
| Period Momentum Indicator | |||||||
| Rate Of Daily Change | |||||||
| Day Median Price | |||||||
| Price Action Indicator | |||||||
| Relative Strength Index | |||||||
| Coefficient Of Variation | |||||||
| Mean Deviation | |||||||
| Jensen Alpha | |||||||
| Total Risk Alpha | |||||||
| Sortino Ratio | |||||||
| Downside Variance | |||||||
| Standard Deviation | |||||||
| Kurtosis | |||||||
| Potential Upside | |||||||
| Treynor Ratio | |||||||
| Maximum Drawdown | |||||||
| Variance | |||||||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | |||||||
| Risk Adjusted Performance | |||||||
| Skewness | |||||||
| Semi Deviation | |||||||
| Information Ratio | |||||||
| Value At Risk | |||||||
| Expected Short fall | |||||||
| Downside Deviation | |||||||
| Semi Variance |
C I Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze C I Against Peers
C I's peer analysis compares C I with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether C I trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where C I leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.