CILEASING Competitors

CILEASING   7.30  -0.15  -2.01%   

C I and NEM INSURANCE Correlation Overview

Poor diversification

The correlation between CILEASING and NEM is 0.75, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Mean reversion opportunities in C I's arise when market prices disconnect from fundamental anchors such as earnings, book value, or historical price-to-earnings multiples.
Relative analysis of C I against direct competitors reveals whether C I's current valuation reflects a genuine competitive advantage or simply market-wide multiple expansion that applies to all sector peers.

C I Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between C I LEASING and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

NEMMULTIVERSE
NEMAIICO
MULTIVERSEAIICO
AIICOWAPIC
MULTIVERSEWAPIC
NEMWAPIC
  

High negative correlations

NEMAFRINSURE
IKEJAHOTELAFRINSURE
AFRINSUREMULTIVERSE
AFRINSUREAIICO
AFRINSUREWAPIC

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between CILEASING Stock performing well and C I Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze C I's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

C I Competitive Analysis

The better you understand C I competitive position, the more informed your investment decisions will be. Measuring C I's performance against peers across a range of fundamental indicators helps expose hidden risks and opportunities.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
CILEASING WAPIC AIICO MULTIVERSE AFRINSURE IKEJAHOTEL NEM
 2.01 
7.30
CILEASING
 0.31 
3.26
CORONATION
 1.43 
4.14
AIICO
 9.78 
18.45
MULTIVERSE
 0.00 
0.20
AFRICAN
 4.64 
36.00
IKEJA
 3.99 
31.30
NEM
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

C I Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze C I Against Peers

C I's peer analysis compares C I with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether C I trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where C I leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.