CATLIN GROUP Competitors

CGL Stock   93.50  0.25  0.27%   
The company is classified under the Capital Markets sector. CATLIN GROUP operates alongside Fair Oaks, Molson Coors, JD Sports, Sportsmans Warehouse, and Everyman Media and other firms in the same space. The peer set adds context for comparison. This comparison view highlights where CATLIN GROUP may offer stronger fundamentals than peers.

Correlation: CATLIN GROUP vs Everyman Media View

Very weak diversification
CGL currently posts a 0.46 correlation with EMAN, indicating a Very weak diversification relationship for the active sample. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.

Moving against CATLIN Stock

  0.640RAE Amoeba SAPairCorr
  0.51GFIN Gfinity PLCPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion in CATLIN GROUP's price occurs when temporary dislocations - caused by sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks - correct back toward the stock's historical fair value.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
92.9593.5094.05
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
83.6184.16102.85
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
92.8193.3693.90
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
92.6294.9097.17
Details
A rigorous investment case for CATLIN GROUP requires more than studying its own financials. Benchmarking CATLIN GROUP's performance, valuation, and risk profile against competitors is essential to validate any investment thesis.

CATLIN GROUP Competition Correlation Matrix

Reviewing how CATLIN GROUP moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.

High positive correlations

EMAN0A8T
EMANJD
0A8TJD
0K2KFA17
JD0K2K
  

High negative correlations

EMANFA17
JDFA17
0A8TFA17
0A8T0K2K
EMAN0K2K

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

CATLIN GROUP Company may look attractive on headline returns alone, but deeper analysis often tells a different story. A thorough review of CATLIN GROUP's risk-adjusted indicators provides a clearer picture of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

CATLIN GROUP Competitive Analysis

To gauge CATLIN GROUP's financial strength, comparing it with Fair Oaks, Molson Coors, and JD Sports offers useful context. CATLIN GROUP is valued at 311.8 M and generates 2.3 M in revenue. A 2.00% return on equity and 221.45% net margin underscore CATLIN GROUP's earnings capacity. On pure scale, Fair Oaks is the bigger entity with market caps of 19.09 B versus 311.8 M. Top-line revenue favors Molson Coors by a wide margin: 11.14 B to 2.3 M. On the bottom line, CATLIN GROUP retains 221.45% while JD Sports manages 4.12%.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
CGL FA17 0K2K JD 0A8T EMAN
 0.27 
93.50
CATLIN
 0.00 
0.48
Fair
 0.41 
43.70
Molson
 1.73 
71.58
JD Sports
 0.76 
1.31
Sportsmans
 0.00 
25.50
Everyman
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Total Asset
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earnings To Growth
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Information Ratio
Value At Risk

CATLIN GROUP Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze CATLIN GROUP Against Peers

CATLIN GROUP's peer analysis compares CATLIN GROUP with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether CATLIN GROUP trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where CATLIN GROUP leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

The peer benchmarking view for CATLIN GROUP is most useful when filtered by business model similarity rather than just sector classification, which can be too broad to be actionable. Comparing small-cap peers in Asset Management & Custody Banks, Financial Services can help separate structural strengths from temporary momentum. For peer comparison, CATLIN GROUP has a market cap of 311.83 M, profit margin of 2.21%.

This section for CATLIN GROUP is built from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with harmonization applied to align reporting definitions. Values may update on different source schedules.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Raphi Shpitalnik - Junior Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on March 8th, 2026