Columbus Competitors
| CCCMDelisted Stock | 10.12 -0.02 -0.20% |
Columbus Circle vs Screaming Eagle Correlation Summary
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Columbus Circle's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Columbus Circle Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Columbus Circle Capital and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Columbus Stock performing well and Columbus Circle Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Columbus Circle's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPCM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| AJAX | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| WPCA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| SPKB | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| FERA | 0.09 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.78 | |||
| GFGD | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| FTEV | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| SCRM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Columbus Circle Competitive Analysis
Columbus Circle's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Sound Point, Ajax I, and Warburg Pincus. A 351.8 M market capitalization places Columbus Circle firmly within this peer set. On pure scale, Columbus Circle is the larger business with market caps of 351.8 M versus 343.5 M. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 1.02 B versus 351.8 M, giving Ajax I a clear size advantage. Columbus Circle is dwarfed by Warburg Pincus on market cap at 361.7 M versus 351.8 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Columbus Circle Against Peers
Columbus Circle's peer analysis compares Columbus Circle with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Columbus Circle trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Columbus Circle leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.