ALGER SPECTRA Competition

ASPCX Fund  USD 24.30  0.53  2.23%   
The fund is listed under the Large Growth category and is part of the Alger family. Alger Spectra is often compared with SIMT LARGE, VELA Large, Wasatch Large, Guidemark Large, and SMEAD VALUE and additional peers. The list provides context for competitive positioning. Use this view to evaluate ALGER SPECTRA versus comparable funds before opening a position.

Correlation: ALGER SPECTRA vs TOUCHSTONE LARGE Overview

Good diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between ASPCX and TACLX stands at -0.15, or Good diversification. In portfolio terms, the overlap visualization shows how much shared movement remains after both positions are combined.

Moving together with ALGER Mutual Fund

  0.67AMGAX Alger Midcap GrowthPairCorr
  0.67AMGOX Alger Mid CapPairCorr
  0.61ASIMX Alger Smidcap FocusPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The concept of mean reversion suggests that ALGER SPECTRA's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
22.0123.7525.49
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
22.2824.0225.76
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
22.0923.8325.58
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
23.7224.4425.17
Details
Competitive analysis for ALGER SPECTRA compares its financial performance, valuation multiples, and growth trajectory against sector peers. This peer-relative view often uncovers mispricing that single-company analysis would miss.

ALGER SPECTRA Competition Correlation Matrix

Studying peer correlation around Alger Spectra Fund gives investors a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Evaluating ALGER Mutual Fund requires separating price momentum from underlying business quality relative to competitors. Without reviewing risk-adjusted indicators, investors may overweight recent returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

ALGER SPECTRA Competitive Analysis

    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
ASPCX SLYCX VELAX WILCX GMLVX SMVLX SVFDX TACLX
 2.23 
24.30
ALGER
 0.95 
13.82
SIMT
 0.37 
16.20
VELA
 0.94 
11.82
Wasatch
 2.47 
15.35
Guidemark
 0.29 
85.64
SMEAD
 0.29 
83.35
Smead
 0.29 
20.58
TOUCHSTONE
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Net Asset
Price To Book
Five Year Return
One Year Return
Last Dividend Paid
Price To Earning
Price To Sales
Cash Position Weight
Equity Positions Weight
Three Year Return
Annual Yield
Year To Date Return
Ten Year Return
Day Typical Price
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

ALGER SPECTRA Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze ALGER SPECTRA Against Peers

ALGER SPECTRA's peer analysis compares ALGER SPECTRA with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether ALGER SPECTRA trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where ALGER SPECTRA leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Analyzing ALGER SPECTRA peers expands diversification context, relative positioning, and sector theme understanding - the view compares related instruments across sectors and thematic groups. Peer benchmarking can improve context for valuation without relying only on standalone multiples.

For Alger Spectra Fund, this section uses fund disclosures and market reference feeds with Macroaxis normalization rules applied to keep cross-asset comparisons consistent. Intraday timing differences may exist.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Rifka Kats - Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on February 22nd, 2026