ADF Competitors

ADFJF Stock  USD 7.33  -0.20  -2.66%   
The company classifies itself in the Materials industry (Metals & Mining sector). ADF Group is often compared with Liquidmetal Technologies, Balyo SA, Austin Engineering, QEP, and Scott Technology and additional peers. Peer context helps frame relative positioning. This peer module benchmarks ADF across key technical and fundamental signals.

Correlation: ADF vs Dialight Plc Snapshot

Poor diversification

For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between ADFJF and DIALF stands at 0.6, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.

Moving against ADF Pink Sheet

  0.86PBCRF PT Bank CentralPairCorr
  0.84IBM International BusinessPairCorr
  0.81PCTTW PureCycle TechnologiesPairCorr
  0.8MSFT MicrosoftPairCorr
  0.76PBCRY Bank Central AsiaPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Statistical evidence for mean reversion in ADF's can be observed through its tendency to revert following periods of extreme overvaluation or undervaluation relative to peers or its own historical range.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
4.447.3310.22
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
5.428.3111.20
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
3.936.819.70
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
6.847.397.95
Details
No single-company analysis of ADF Group is complete without peer benchmarking. Comparing ADF's margins, returns, and growth against industry averages reveals competitive strengths and weaknesses not visible in isolation.

ADF Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between ADF Group and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

DIALFQEPC
AMROFAUSTF
DIALFLQMT
AMROFQEPC
DIGTFLQMT
DIALFAMROF
  

High negative correlations

SCTTFBYYLF
NRSAFDIGTF
DIALFNRSAF
NRSAFAUSTF
NRSAFLQMT
NRSAFAMROF

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between ADF Pink Sheet performing well and ADF Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze ADF's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

ADF Competitive Analysis

To fully evaluate ADF as an investment, it is important to compare ADF's key metrics against direct competitors. Investors who understand the competitive forces facing ADF can better anticipate future earnings trajectories. Placing ADF next to Liquidmetal Technologies, Balyo SA, and Thruvision Group puts raw numbers into competitive context. A 51.0 M valuation paired with 280.7 M in revenue sets the baseline. Shareholders see a 11.70% return on equity, supported by a 5.47% profit margin. Meanwhile, Liquidmetal Technologies provides a different benchmark. ADF pulls in 280.7 M in revenue while the other reports 529,000. The gap between ADF and Balyo SA is instructive. ADF leads with 11.70% return on equity versus -543.04% for Balyo SA. Thruvision Group offers a useful contrast. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 4.99 B versus 51.0 M, giving Thruvision Group a clear size advantage. Taken as a whole, the peer data reinforces that ADF's competitive advantages and vulnerabilities are best understood in relative terms rather than in isolation.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
ADFJF LQMT BYYLF DIGTF AUSTF QEPC SCTTF AMROF NRSAF DIALF
 2.66 
7.33
ADF
 8.33 
0.13
Liquidmetal
 0.00 
0.40
Balyo
 37.50 
0.01
Thruvision
 12.50 
0.14
Austin
 2.90 
41.16
QEP
 0.00 
1.14
Scott
 4.76 
0.20
Amaero
 0.00 
0.65
Norse
 0.00 
4.10
Dialight
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Z Score
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Number Of Shares Shorted
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Last Dividend Paid
Target Price
Short Ratio
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

ADF Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze ADF Against Peers

ADF's peer analysis compares ADF with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether ADF trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where ADF leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.