ADF Competitors
| ADFJF Stock | USD 7.33 -0.20 -2.66% |
Correlation: ADF vs Dialight Plc Snapshot
Poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between ADFJF and DIALF stands at 0.6, or Poor diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving against ADF Pink Sheet
Statistical evidence for mean reversion in ADF's can be observed through its tendency to revert following periods of extreme overvaluation or undervaluation relative to peers or its own historical range.
ADF Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between ADF Group and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between ADF Pink Sheet performing well and ADF Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze ADF's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LQMT | 5.11 | 0.80 | 0.09 | 0.57 | 4.97 | 11.11 | 21.11 | |||
| BYYLF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| DIGTF | 1.46 | 0.58 | 0.00 | -0.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 56.48 | |||
| AUSTF | 3.74 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 16.67 | 74.24 | |||
| QEPC | 1.65 | 0.24 | 0.10 | -1.52 | 1.84 | 3.74 | 13.80 | |||
| SCTTF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| AMROF | 5.60 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 5.74 | 13.33 | 50.72 | |||
| NRSAF | 1.88 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 36.87 | |||
| DIALF | 0.56 | 0.28 | 0.00 | -1.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.20 |
ADF Competitive Analysis
To fully evaluate ADF as an investment, it is important to compare ADF's key metrics against direct competitors. Investors who understand the competitive forces facing ADF can better anticipate future earnings trajectories. Placing ADF next to Liquidmetal Technologies, Balyo SA, and Thruvision Group puts raw numbers into competitive context. A 51.0 M valuation paired with 280.7 M in revenue sets the baseline. Shareholders see a 11.70% return on equity, supported by a 5.47% profit margin. Meanwhile, Liquidmetal Technologies provides a different benchmark. ADF pulls in 280.7 M in revenue while the other reports 529,000. The gap between ADF and Balyo SA is instructive. ADF leads with 11.70% return on equity versus -543.04% for Balyo SA. Thruvision Group offers a useful contrast. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 4.99 B versus 51.0 M, giving Thruvision Group a clear size advantage. Taken as a whole, the peer data reinforces that ADF's competitive advantages and vulnerabilities are best understood in relative terms rather than in isolation.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
ADF Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze ADF Against Peers
ADF's peer analysis compares ADF with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether ADF trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where ADF leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.