IShares MSCI Competition
| ACWI Etf | USD 136.54 -2.84 -2.04% |
Correlation: IShares MSCI vs Capital Group View
Almost no diversification
Across the chosen horizon, ACWI and CGDV show a correlation of 0.94 and fall into the Almost no diversification bucket. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with IShares Etf
| 1.0 | VT | Vanguard Total World | PairCorr |
| 0.69 | ACWV | iShares MSCI Global | PairCorr |
| 0.86 | IOO | iShares Global 100 | PairCorr |
| 0.97 | URTH | iShares MSCI World | PairCorr |
Moving against IShares Etf
The mean reversion tendency in IShares MSCI's price is a well-documented phenomenon that disciplined investors can exploit by identifying when price has diverged substantially from fundamental and historical anchors.
IShares MSCI Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how iShares MSCI ACWI moves relative to competing etfs can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
IShares MSCI Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Surface-level performance for IShares Etf can mask how the business actually stacks up against its competitive set. A thorough review of IShares MSCI's risk-adjusted indicators provides a clearer picture of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USMV | 0.40 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 2.85 | |||
| IUSV | 0.50 | 0.04 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 0.97 | 2.92 | |||
| IDEV | 0.76 | 0.06 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 5.16 | |||
| IYW | 1.04 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 6.02 | |||
| EEM | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 1.64 | 2.13 | 7.80 | |||
| DVY | 0.57 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.64 | 1.19 | 3.23 | |||
| EWJ | 0.98 | 0.10 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 7.57 | |||
| MDY | 0.72 | 0.08 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 5.55 | |||
| IWP | 0.87 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 5.80 | |||
| CGDV | 0.56 | 0.04 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 4.27 |
IShares MSCI Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
IShares MSCI Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze IShares MSCI Against Peers
IShares MSCI's peer analysis compares IShares MSCI with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether IShares MSCI trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where IShares MSCI leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Return on invested capital comparison for IShares MSCI versus peers reveals which companies in the group are genuinely creating value. Momentum comparison for IShares MSCI across peers can signal rotation when peers accelerate while IShares MSCI lags or vice versa. Divergence between IShares MSCI and its peers often has a fundamental explanation worth investigating. This section is designed to make peer positioning easier to interpret at a glance.
This section for iShares MSCI ACWI is built from fund disclosures and market reference feeds, with harmonization applied to align reporting definitions. Values may update on different source schedules.